Compensation sought for blood scam victims

Indo-Asian News Service

Write an email about this article
View the source for this article (may require registration or a fee).
Fair Use

KOLKATA: India's largest patients' rights body led by US-based Aids researcher Kunal Saha has demanded compensation for the hundreds of thousands of people in West Bengal who are feared to have received HIV contaminated blood as a result of faulty blood-test kits bought by the state government.

The kits were supplied by a Secunderabad-based company which got the contract in December 2004 after the West Bengal State Aids Control and Prevention Society floated tenders. Countless people in West Bengal are feared to have received HIV and Hepatitis contaminated blood.

"We demand adequate compensation for all victims of this 'kit' scandal. Unless you take immediate action for equitable justice for the victims, we will have no other option but to move the court seeking justice for this heinous crime," Saha said by phone from Ohio yesterday.

His organisation People for Better Treatment (PBT) has sent a letter to state Health Minister Suryakanta Misra drawing attention to the crisis in West Bengal's healthcare as a result of transfusion of contaminated blood products due to use of 'substandard kits' supplied by Monozyme India.

"The hapless patients are paying the ultimate price for the failure of the inept members in the health department who were responsible for monitoring the 'kits' that were approved for testing the blood samples," Saha said in the letter.

"We are shocked to notice that in order to shield the unscrupulous healthcare workers and to protect Monozyme India, a rumour is being spread in the media that the 'kits' were merely out of their expiry dates," he said.

"All blood-test kits (whether antibody- or PCR (polymerase chain reaction)-based) that are used for detection of viruses like HIV must contain a 'positive' and a 'negative' control for proper identification of contaminated blood samples. It is impossible that a simple 'expiration' of date of these 'kits' could result in this mass scale failure of blood banks to detect contaminated blood," said Saha, who is working on developing an HIV/Aids vaccine in the US.

"As the largest humanitarian society, (PBT) dedicated to protect patients' interests, we seek an immediate disclosure of the investigation done by the health department to uncover the truth in this scandal," he said.

Saha formed the PBT in course of fighting a legal battle against the medical fraternity after his wife died of alleged medical negligence in India during a visit in 1998.

"We demand that a search should be undertaken immediately to identify all victims of this 'kit' scandal, many of whom are still unaware about their impending danger, by inserting advertisements in popular media," he said.

Ghyansham Sarda, one of the accused in the expired blood test kit scandal and his brother Govind, who owns Monozyme, were arrested on Thursday.

All hospitals and blood banks in West Bengal were earlier alerted against using expired blood test kits supplied by the company.

Health workers fear that thousands of people in West Bengal might have received infected blood because the expired and faulty kits would have failed to detect any contamination. The expiry dates on the kits had reportedly been tampered with.

Monozyme India is said to have bagged the contract by quoting Rs20 a kit against the Rs60-70 quoted by rivals. The company had supplied tens of thousands of kits meant for detecting infections 'such as HIV, Hepatitis B or C' in collected blood.

Till August 2006, it had supplied the government over 140,000 kits for testing Hepatitis B and C alone, health officials said.



Fair Use Statement: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available, provided as informational resources only in support of the democratic process, consistent with the nonprofit, public-interest mission of Independent Arts & Media. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Comments